NCATE and the Missouri Department of Elementary and Secondary Education (DESE) have notified us that our onsite review will take place between November 12-16, 2011. In preparation for that review the NCATE process continues with the Transformation Initiative proposal sent to NCATE representing a partnership between Springfield School District, Baptist Bible College, Drury University, Evangel University and Missouri State University. The focus of this collaboration is on the NCATE Standard 3 “Field Experiences and Clinical Practice” and Standard 4 “Diversity”. The intent is to have each higher education institution achieve a “Target” level of achievement over the next three to five years. The project is called a Teacher Education Alliance (TEA) and the proposal to NCATE noted that this project was, “partially funded through a grant from the Community Foundation of the Ozarks (CFO). Missouri State University is the first of the collaborating institutions to undergo accreditation review using the new Transformation Initiative option.
The dual purpose of the TEA is to (a) enhance educator preparation and (b) meet the needs of high-poverty schools. For the purposes of our Transformation Initiative, a high-poverty school is defined as one in which 70% or more of the students qualify for free or reduced-price lunch (FRL). The commitments of the Teacher Education Alliance are based on the following premise: ‘If we are to prepare high-quality educators to meet the challenges of tomorrow’s schools, we must transform schools of education so that improving school practice is at the core of our collective work’ (Jacobson, et al., 1998, p. 143)… Our joint pilot effort is designed as a model to exercise leadership for both transforming educator preparation and improving P-12 student learning. Our partnership initially will be with the Springfield Public Schools (SPS)… and in the future with other urban, suburban and rural schools to transform teacher preparation at the initial certification level and at advanced levels for counselors and school administrators.”
During this past month we were alerted by the Missouri Department of Elementary and Secondary Education, Dr. David Adams, about a reminder that, “the 2006 revision to (Missouri Standards for Teacher Education Programs) MoSTEP removed the language that appeared to require candidates’ portfolios. This was replaced with language (in) MoSTEP Standard 2 and Standard 3 regarding ‘clearly identified, valid, fair, and non-biased assessment system.” The MoSTEP team will be reviewing data from your Unit and programs assessment system. MoSTEP will not review/grade portfolios or Teacher Work Samples (TWS). They must be able to review rubrics used to determine scores…” This places additional responsibility on all programs to determine clearly the 6-8 assessments for their program (see a SPA Section II format) with appropriate data and the MoSTEP eleven (11) “Quality Indicators” have data supporting each. Thus a reminder that we need to have all programs submit their NCATE assessments to Annice McLean(AMcLean@missouristate.edu) or Paula Giles (PGiles@missouristate.edu) . Those programs that did not complete a SPA need to upload their information and data to the Share Point folder for the specific section(s) of the MoSTEP template.
Some highlights of the past four weeks include the following:
- Surveys to graduates and their employers were conducted in recent weeks. That information is being placed on Share Point and sent as an attachment to each Program Coordinator.
- Drafts of discussions on Transition Points (regular programs and post baccalaureate programs) required by NCATE and DESE with our institution activities
- Drafts of discussions with technology university specialists on a computer management system approach to handle Transition Point activities
- Additional program assessments updates submitted by programs placed on the STEPS system
- Additional MoSTEP review updates and information submitted by programs to the Share Point system
During this academic year much effort has been made for each program to gather information and upload that material to a computer management system (Share Point) in preparation for the DESE onsite review. Other programs submitted their Specialized Professional Associations (SPA) seeking continued national program accreditation.
Now it is time to review the data and information collected by each program. This early fall each program will be asked to review the data and information they have collected for calendar year 2009 including reviewing the Annual Report which has helpful information on each program currently being prepared by the Department Heads, Program Coordinators and Deans. The review will involve each program answering a set of questions as part of an annual review process each year to focus on strengths, areas of program concerns, and recommended future action(s). In the spring of each year, starting in April and May 2011 the annual program review process will occur. Finally, beginning in the fall of 2010 each program will also be focused on writing the DESE Program Report (due May 1, 2011) taking information from the Share Point along with updated data and information collected from the spring and fall 2010 semesters.