Archives for September 2021
Congratulations, Professor Gnau!
The Missouri Council for Activity and Nutrition (MOCAN) awarded Jaime Gnau, a registered dietitian nutritionist and clinical instructor of dietetics at Missouri State University, with the Excellence in Connecting Health to the Community award.
The award recognizes a Missouri healthcare professional who goes above and beyond to promote healthy eating and active living in his or her community.
Gnau, also a dietitian at the MSU Care clinic, partnered with Ozarks Food Harvest in the early days of the COVID-19 pandemic to provide food for clinic patients, many of whom face food insecurity.
The program was a huge success and is still active.
As of August 2021, the clinic has distributed 30,427 pounds of food, which equates to 25,355 meals.
Read more about Gnau’s work with the MSU Care clinic
MSU Care clinic faculty and staff volunteer once a month to make the food distribution program happen.
If you are interested in volunteering, contact Gnau or the MSU Care clinic
People in the U.S. have a constitutional right to a jury trial. Yet, more than 95% of criminal convictions result from guilty pleas rather than jury verdicts.
The bulk of these guilty pleas come from plea bargaining. This occurs when prosecutors offer reduced sentences to defendants. In return, they waive their right to a trial.
Even those who are innocent can plead guilty. Factors that encourage guilty pleas, such as the promise of immediate release from jail, can be just as alluring to innocent defendants as guilty ones.
The pandemic’s effect on plea deals
COVID-19 has impacted the criminal justice system in two major ways:
- There were outbreaks in prisons and jails because of close physical contact.
- Defendants had to wait even longer for their day in court because courts closed or limited their operations.
Did the added risk of COVID exposure in jail make defendants, whether guilty or not, more likely to plead guilty to avoid pretrial detention?
A team of researchers that included Missouri State University’s Dr. David Zimmerman worked to find out through an experimental study.
Using a computer simulation, the researchers surveyed more than 700 adults through an online platform called Prolific Academic. Dr. Miko Wilford at the University of Massachusetts Lowell developed the program with funding from the National Science Foundation.
“Participants created an avatar and were told their character has been accused of theft. They’re stuck in jail because of a previous conviction,” explained Zimmerman, associate professor of psychology. “They were also presented with a plea offer – plead guilty and get probation.”
The researchers randomly assigned participants to be either innocent or guilty of stealing a pair of sunglasses. In addition, half of them got information that COVID-19 was spreading in the jail and court dates were pushed back due to the pandemic – the other half did not.
What the results showed
“We found that those variables impacted the guilty plea outcome,” Zimmerman said. “Guilty people were more likely to plead guilty, which is typical. But the COVID information – that sort of heavy-handed manipulation regarding the pandemic – also influenced innocent people to plead guilty.”
Data further revealed that innocent participants ranked the COVID threat as a more important factor causing them to plead guilty than did guilty participants.
He co-wrote an article summarizing this study, which was recently published in the Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied. The article highlights existing issues in the system that COVID has worsened.
“In particular, pretrial detention can coerce people – guilty or innocent – into pleading guilty,” Zimmerman said.
He notes that to their credit, prosecutors have made efforts to reduce pretrial detention and otherwise be more lenient to nonviolent offenders during the pandemic.
“Unfortunately, that doesn’t change the fundamental imbalance that is present in plea negotiations,” Zimmerman said. “It’s largely up to the prosecutor whether he or she uses the additional leverage against defendants created by the pandemic.”