The FCTL aims to provide you with as many resources from our center and ways to keep up-to-date with what’s happening as possible. In today’s day and age, that means ensuring you can find us on a variety of social media platforms. While the FCTL can be found on the typical social media channels (Facebook, Twitter, etc.), there’s some other platforms we share information on that you may not be aware of, as well as a new opportunity to connect this semester. Take a look at the list below to make sure you don’t miss any ways you can get connected with us! [Read more…] about Get Connected with the FCTL
There has been quite a bit published recently since OpenAI’s release of their tool ChatGPT, which is marketed as a tool to revolutionize writing. Simply enter a prompt and “BAM” an essay is generated on the topic, varying in levels of quality based on information pulled from the internet.
This technology isn’t different than tools you may already using such as PackBack, a platform commonly used to promote student inquiry in discussion or improve writing skills by utilizing AI “conversation” to provide feedback to students to encourage deeper thinking about a topic. The AI technologies are trained to respond in a conversational tone, mimicking interaction with a human.
Should you worry?
I don’t think it is time to sound the alarm, but it is important that you are aware of these tools and what their capabilities are. Sure, AI can spit out a very convincing sample of writing based on information it gathers from the web. However, it cannot discern credible from non-credible information, nor can it evaluate level of importance in information. It isn’t capable of the type of critical thinking and information synthesis we value and expect in our student’s writing. And if you’re worried you’ll be fooled by an AI generated paper, don’t worry, a student from Princeton University has already developed an app to help detect AI written content, called GPTZero.
So, what do we do?
You know that old saying “if you can’t beat them, join them?” Unfortunately, these tools are out there, whether you are choosing to use the commercially packaged versions marketed to you as a tool to improve things like student engagement; or your students are accessing them on their own from platforms like ChatGPT. We could be leveraging them to support learning. Bringing the conversation to our students is one way to start. Having the conversation around the capability of these tools and their shortcomings is a great start. You might even include examples of what your students should be capable of producing versus what a tool like ChatGPT can produce. You could even go as far as having your students evaluate AI generated content to identify shortcomings. Students truly do want to learn; the more authentic your assessments are the more they learn and retain and the less impact an AI bot will have in your course.
Note: I have verified this post was not written by AI…
Resources to Consider:
- Ten Facts About ChatGPT from TeachOnline.CA
- ChatGPT & Education from Northern Illinois University
- Practical Responses to ChaptGPT from Montclair State University
- ChatGPT – Learn More from SUNY Online
References
Bowers-Abbot, M. (2023). What are we doing about AI essays? Faculty Focus. Retrieved https://www.facultyfocus.com/articles/teaching-with-technology-articles/what-are-we-doing-about-ai-essays/?st=FFdaily%3Bsc%3DFF230104%3Butm_term%3DFF230104&mailingID=4320
Bowman, E. (2023). A college student created an app that can tell whether AI wrote and essay. NPR. Retrieved https://www.npr.org/2023/01/09/1147549845/gptzero-ai-chatgpt-edward-tian-plagiarism
D’Agostino, S. (2023). ChatGPT advice academics can use now. Inside Higher Ed. Retrieved https://www.insidehighered.com/news/2023/01/12/academic-experts-offer-advice-chatgpt#.Y8HH5nHqtGg.link
McMurtrie, B. (2022). AI and the future of undergraduate writing: Teaching experts are concerned, but not for the reasons you think. Chronicle of Higher Education. Retrieved https://www.chronicle.com/article/ai-and-the-future-of-undergraduate-writing
Micro-activities and improved student learning
By Nancy Gordon
Searching through Magna Commons library led to the discovery of a 20-Minute Mentor titled “How can I use microactivities to engage students and improve learning and retention?” by Dr. Wren Mills at Western Kentucky University. This video can be accessed from Magna Subscription in the Academic Community and will be the featured Monday Morning Mentor on April 4th.
An earlier discussion on active learning prompted this search when a faculty member asked, “What does active learning look like? Isn’t all learning active?” This is a great question! It seems as educators we like to create labels and sort things into boxes!
All learning is essentially active, however, Chickering and Gamson (1987) suggested that students must do more than listen, that they should be actively engaged with the content. To achieve a deeper understanding of the content they must read, write, discuss, practice tasks, and engage in problem solving activities. The core of active learning are instructional activities that involve students in doing and thinking about what they are doing.
Micro-activities (back to the labels!), are short learning activities, usually 5 to 10 minutes, that allow students to actively engage with the content and are an effective way for the instructor to check for understanding. These types of activities can be used at the beginning of class to create a sense of inquiry, as a reading check, or to reinforce the last session. Micro-activities can also be used to break up lectures every 15 to 20 minutes and at the end of class as a review or to create interest in the next class session. Lang’s (2016) book “Small Teaching” outlines nine approaches to this type of structure that supports knowledge, understanding, and inspiration.
Dr. Mills suggests the following reasons to use of micro-activities to engage students and improve learning:
- Most people have a 15-minute attention span.
- Learning new information is easier when it is presented as a series of shorter and spaced sessions rather than one long session.
- Learners must touch information multiple times and in multiple ways to move from short-term to long-term memory.
- Learners need frequent and supportive feedback/review.
Marin (2011) compiled a list of 50 Micro-Activities for energizing the College Classroom. Examples of micro-activities that can be used at the beginning, middle, or end of class are:
- Bookends: at the beginning of class students spend one-minute to write what they already know about the topic and then spend one-minute at the end of the class to write what they learned that was new about the topic. Ask students to turn in their bookend paper before leaving class.
- Test Prep: at the end of the lesson have students write a test question over what was just discussed. Take 2 minutes where students can share with a classmate to answer and critique.
- Rose and Thorn: students share what they enjoyed most about the class session and what is unclear or confusing. These can be addressed on Blackboard before the next class or at the beginning of the next class.
Advice for integrating micro-activities:
- Keep it simple. Don’t use too many micro-activities in a single class period.
- Clickers, polling software, and other apps can be used for engaging micro-activities; but be sure to try out in advance and be prepared with any materials or supplies that may be needed.
- Let students know what the activity is and why you are doing it.
- Many of these activities can become back-pocket activities that can be used on the spot as deemed appropriate.
- Be sure the activity aligns with the learning goal for the day or with a course objective.
Contact the FCTL@missouristate.edu for more information on micro-activities or access Dr. Mills video from the Magna Commons Library found in the Academic Community on Blackboard. If you’d like more information or assistance with activating your Magna Commons subscription, contact the FCTL.
References
Chickering, A. and Gamson, Z. (1987). Seven principles for good practice in undergraduate education. American Association for Higher Education.
Hattie, J., and Yates, G. (2014). How learning is acquired. In Visible learning and the science of how we learn. Routledge.
Lang, J. M. (2016). Small teaching: Everyday lessons from the science of learning. Jossey-Bass.
Marin, A. (2011). Using active learning to energize the psychology classroom: Fifty exercises that take five minutes or less. Presented at the National Institute on the Teaching of Psychology.
Mills, W. (2019). Magna 20-Minute Mentor: How can I use microactivities to engage students and improve learning and retention? Magna Publications.